Text mode popen

[adam2020]

Hi guys,

first time poster sorry if my post is in the wrong format,

anyway I'm following the docs - https://docs.python.org/3/library/subpro...ommunicate

prc.communicate()

returns a tuple of stdout and stderr,

prc = popen(command,stdout = PIPE,stderr = PIPE

so the above code creates a new process I specify that stdout will be PIPE,first off what does stdout = PIPE do and how does it relate the functionality in this case of the function/method prc.communicate()?

secondly I read that this will return the output of the command in bytes but what if I want to get the string of the output and not the bytes? I read that you need to to specify a text mode attribute but how is this done?

thanks

[snippsat]

secondly I read that this will return the output of the command in bytes but what if I want to get the string of the output and not the bytes?

Use decode() to go from bytes to string in Python 3.
Also run() has made it simpler to catch output as it has a parameter capture_output=True.

import subprocess

out = subprocess.run(['ping', 'google.com'], capture_output=True)
print(out.stdout.decode()) #Same as decode('utf-8')

Output:
Pinging google.com [216.58.211.142] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.58.211.142: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=54
Reply from 216.58.211.142: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=54
Reply from 216.58.211.142: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=54
Reply from 216.58.211.142: bytes=32 time=47ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 216.58.211.142:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 47ms, Maximum = 77ms, Average = 64ms

[adam2020]

thanks snippsat great answer :)

what is the main difference

between

sub = subprocess.run()

and

process = popen(['command])(

and when would you choose to use one over the other?

thanks

[snippsat]

and when would you choose to use one over the other?

It's explained in Using the subprocess Module.

The recommended approach to invoking subprocesses is to use the run() function for all use cases it can handle.
For more advanced use cases, the underlying Popen interface can be used directly.

So in my example run() can handle getting output from ping command,so then i should use run().

[adam2020]

thanks snippsat :)

only issue I am getting is that print(out.stdout.decode()) #Same as decode('utf-8')

the decode() function doesn't seem to be a function of out.stdout.decode() on my implementation, also the capture output param doesn't seem to be available on my implementation neither

I'm using python3

---

I'm using Python 3.5.2 from what I read the capture_output flag and decode() are only added in 3.7

is there any alternative?

[snippsat]

I'm using Python 3.5.2 from what I read the capture_output flag and decode() are only added in 3.7

Upgrade your Python version.

is there any alternative?

Sure both Popen and check_output() can be used.

from subprocess import check_output 

# linux
#out = check_output(['ping', '-c', '4', 'google.com'])
out = check_output(['ping', 'google.com'])
print(out.decode())

import subprocess

with subprocess.Popen(['ping', 'google.com'], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE) as p:
    out, err = p.communicate()
    print(out.decode())

[adam2020]

thanks snippsat :)

so many ways :p