True == not False

[Skaperen]

i read that True == not False is a syntax error ... but why?

[Mekire]

This actually surprised me, which goes to show how rarely you would write == followed by not I suppose. I assumed it would work but nope; it is indeed a syntax error.

Anyway:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/6100328

[ichabod801]

Fascinating. But not False == True is not a syntax error.

[Larz60+]

very interesting, however
safe:

>>> True != True
False
>>> True != False
True
>>> False != False
False
>>> False != True
True
>>>

But when would you ever need it?

[Skaperen]

change "==" to "is" and it works OK. but i cannot imagine ever needing it. i read this while reading the library reference and it piqued my curiosity. i wonder if it is a syntax error for all the interpreters/compilers.

[perfringo]

Good read about Python's True and False by Guido van Rossum: The story of None, True and False (and an explanation of literals, keywords and builtins thrown in)

[DeaD_EyE]

True == not False
can be written as:
True == != False
which is also a syntax error.

Use instead:
True != False

PS: In our company we make jokes about double negation.