Oct-02-2018, 04:53 AM
sets are limited to hashable types. i am looking for a data type where i can stuff in many complex (not hashable) data objects where i don't need to retain the order. a list retains the order. i am wondering if there is something that can more efficient than a list, but, unlike a set, can hold any data type. i expect to have over a million of these objects and some containing over 100 items, storing a total of a few million items.
Tradition is peer pressure from dead people
What do you call someone who speaks three languages? Trilingual. Two languages? Bilingual. One language? American.
What do you call someone who speaks three languages? Trilingual. Two languages? Bilingual. One language? American.