Seems pretty consistent with PEP 8.
It's probably someone who was assigned with the project to write standards,
found PEP8, wrote the report (verbatim - 1) and sucked in the accolades.
Quote:Seems pretty consistent with PEP 8.
Is mostly copy from Google Python Style Guide as they mention.
Quote:Much of the text here is from the Google Python Style Guide.
They could have just linked to
PEP-8(now stylized up).
But that's maybe not so cool for CIA
(Mar-08-2017, 01:02 AM)snippsat Wrote: [ -> ]Is mostly copy from Google Python Style Guide as they mention.
Ah, I didn't read it that closely. Also it seems like Google's just mostly PEP 8 anyway :)
it might be more fun if we had a style guide that was thoroughly non-pep-8 so we could write better obfuscated and un-readable (except maybe among us) code.
Skaperen, I thought you said you didn't like lisp.
But then you like obfuscated and un-readable code.
(Mar-08-2017, 03:18 AM)Larz60+ Wrote: [ -> ]Skaperen, I thought you said you didn't like lisp.
But then you like obfuscated and un-readable code.
it is possible to make unreadable code without resorting to lisp. i have done it in many languages.
