(Apr-26-2017, 05:08 PM)Larz60+ Wrote: [ -> ]Quote:And there are lot of bugs in all compilers,i could not even run my helloworld cpp properly.
I used C++ for many years. I'm not sure I found a single bug during all that time.
Perhaps the problem was your code?
Or lack of knowledge on how to use the compiler.
No.by bugs i mean errors,
The tutors about c++ on the web did not said about the C++ version of the tutor.I knows how to use the compilers.But the compilers were old.But i felt comfort with the recent compilers.i quit because of the hardness to grasp the knowledge from a complex lang like C++
(Apr-26-2017, 04:45 PM)metulburr Wrote: [ -> ](10 hours ago)RandoomDude Wrote:
But there is not enough Beginner friendly tutors
Where are you looking? There are a lot if you google a speciifc activity.
We have our own tutorials
https://python-forum.io/Forum-Tutorials
and there references to other tutorials
https://python-forum.io/Thread-A-List-of...-Resources
If you have trouble finding a tutorial anywhere we take requests (though its at our own timeframe)
https://python-forum.io/Thread-Tutorial-Requests
i did not mean there is not beginner friendly tutors about python.i was talking about c++ 's tutor availability
Yes C and C++ are hard to grasp but were so rewarding.
I was first introduced to C at Bell Labs in New Jersey, in the early 80's
and used it up until just three years ago.
If I do any more embedded work, I'd probably do it in C.
(Apr-26-2017, 05:08 PM)Larz60+ Wrote: [ -> ]I used C++ for many years. I'm not sure I found a single bug during all that time.
Perhaps the problem was your code?
Or lack of knowledge on how to use the compiler.
About a decade ago I've wasted a couple of hours
trying to figure out a weird undocumented - then - parameter to
String (I think it was
traits?!). Of course, it was MS Studio
. And no one around could help
.
But it was real pleasure to test and debug DLLs with Python snippets, loading them (DLLs) with
ctypes. My colleagues used to write wrapper application in C++. Guess which was quicker
?!
Python is the only language that i had fun in learning.
for Python
(Apr-27-2017, 04:14 AM)RandoomDude Wrote: [ -> ]Python is the only language that i had fun in learning.
I have enjoyed
this online Scala course immensely.
It was a good challenge, and it taught me a trick or two. I probably will never write Scala, but it felt good to be challenged.
There are challenges in Python too, you know
(Apr-26-2017, 04:32 PM)RandoomDude Wrote: [ -> ]But C++ is complex and it has multiple types of functions and headers.its not easy to remember them all.
All languages have reasonably large standard libraries, Python included. It just isn't necessary to try and remember all the things - you can look things up in the standard library reference for the language. The things you end up using most frequently will stick in your brain.
(Apr-27-2017, 05:02 AM)volcano63 Wrote: [ -> ]I have enjoyed this online Scala course immensely.
There is a Programming language named scala?
this lang,is that OOP?
Scala is a language that compiles to Java bytecode (and hence runs anywhere Java runs, since it will run on the Java Virtual Machine). It supports object oriented programming, but is also quite heavy on functional programming.
(Apr-27-2017, 05:48 AM)ndc85430 Wrote: [ -> ]is also quite heavy on functional programming
If it contains heavy functional programming,i suppose that ,it will turn off your fun.
(Apr-27-2017, 03:17 AM)Larz60+ Wrote: [ -> ]C and C++ are hard to grasp but were so rewarding.
"Were"?
C is not that rewarding for a hobbyist,but it is for a pro programmer