preferred?: multiple assignment - Printable Version +- Python Forum (https://python-forum.io) +-- Forum: Python Coding (https://python-forum.io/forum-7.html) +--- Forum: General Coding Help (https://python-forum.io/forum-8.html) +--- Thread: preferred?: multiple assignment (/thread-1092.html) |
preferred?: multiple assignment - Skaperen - Dec-03-2016 which would be preferred for assigning x to 6 variables: a,b,c,d,e,f=x,x,x,x,xvs. a=b=c=d=e=f=xand is there also a preferred style? RE: preferred?: multiple assignment - micseydel - Dec-03-2016 The latter is definitely more concise and to-the-point. I would go with that unless you want identity to different when equality would still be equal (e.g. a bunch of empty tuples). RE: preferred?: multiple assignment - nilamo - Dec-05-2016 If they're all the same value, I'd prefer the chaining (second example). But I think the first just shouldn't be used for more than two variables, otherwise it gets difficult to read. RE: preferred?: multiple assignment - Skaperen - Dec-17-2016 (Dec-03-2016, 03:18 AM)Skaperen Wrote: which would be preferred for assigning x to 6 variables: i guess no one noticed my typo of only 5 xs in the first code. RE: preferred?: multiple assignment - micseydel - Dec-17-2016 (Dec-17-2016, 03:28 AM)Skaperen Wrote: i guess no one noticed my typo of only 5 xs in the first code.All the more reason it shouldn't be preferred :) RE: preferred?: multiple assignment - Skaperen - Dec-19-2016 (Dec-17-2016, 07:56 AM)micseydel Wrote:agreed(Dec-17-2016, 03:28 AM)Skaperen Wrote: i guess no one noticed my typo of only 5 xs in the first code.All the more reason it shouldn't be preferred :) RE: preferred?: multiple assignment - Ofnuts - Dec-19-2016 (Dec-19-2016, 08:00 AM)Skaperen Wrote:(Dec-17-2016, 07:56 AM)micseydel Wrote: All the more reason it shouldn't be preferred :)agreed On the contrary... both of these are invalid Python a,b,c,e,f=x,x,x,x,x a,b,c,d,e,f=x,x,x,xSo even if a human doesn't notice the problem, Python will. While: a,b,d,e,f=xis correct and you'll be told about the unitialized c much later.
|