Python Forum
Syntax error not understood - Printable Version

+- Python Forum (https://python-forum.io)
+-- Forum: Python Coding (https://python-forum.io/forum-7.html)
+--- Forum: General Coding Help (https://python-forum.io/forum-8.html)
+--- Thread: Syntax error not understood (/thread-1438.html)

Syntax error not understood - raady07 - Jan-03-2017

Hi, 

Completely new user for Python coding. Please help to understand the error. 

import math 

def euclideanDistance(instance1,instance2, length):
    distance = 0
    for x in range(length):
        distance += pow((instance1[x]-instance2[x],2)
        return math.sqrt(distance)
it displays the following error 

Error:
File "test6.py", line 9
    return math.sqrt(distance)
         ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
please ignore the thread it was just a syntax error

distance += pow((instance1[x]-instance2[x],2))

RE: Syntax error not understood - Mekire - Jan-03-2017

When you get a syntax error like this the problem is often in the previous line.
You forgot a parenthesis.

RE: Syntax error not understood - Ofnuts - Jan-03-2017

Also, for integer powers, you can use the '**' operator:
distance += (instance1[x]-instance2[x])**2


RE: Syntax error not understood - pedros - Jan-03-2017

slightly off-topic but it seems the ** operator isn't limited to integers, for either exponent or mantissa, which would allow one to change the code to not import math and simply raise the distance to the power of 1/2

>>> 9**0.5
3.0

RE: Syntax error not understood - Ofnuts - Jan-04-2017

(Jan-03-2017, 12:57 PM)pedros Wrote: slightly off-topic but it seems the ** operator isn't limited to integers, for either exponent or mantissa, which would allow one to change the code to not import math and simply raise the distance to the power of 1/2

>>> 9**0.5
3.0

math.sqrt() may have some optimizations... and a good compiler could replace the operation with inlined multiplications when the exponent of '**' is a small integer constant.

RE: Syntax error not understood - Larz60+ - Jan-04-2017

One thing that was not mentioned. Your return statement is part of the loop.
That means you will never see a second iteration, thus negating the purpose of the loop