![]() |
dnspython update dns record issue - Printable Version +- Python Forum (https://python-forum.io) +-- Forum: Python Coding (https://python-forum.io/forum-7.html) +--- Forum: General Coding Help (https://python-forum.io/forum-8.html) +--- Thread: dnspython update dns record issue (/thread-2262.html) |
dnspython update dns record issue - stamnik - Mar-02-2017 I'm trying to use dnspython to do a TSIG based dynamic DNS update. I've followed the example code : #!/usr/bin/env python import sys import dns.update import dns.query import dns.tsigkeyring keyring = dns.tsigkeyring.from_text({ 'keyname.' : 'VarFF=2Xts7T5Vb/xd&8ir==' }) update = dns.update.Update('domain_name', keyring=keyring) update.replace('myserver', 30, 'a', '88.88.88.88') response = dns.query.tcp(update, 'dns_ip',timeout=10) and here is what I got: response = dns.query.tcp(update, 'dns_ip',timeout=10) File "/root/bck/dnspython/dns/query.py", line 475, in tcp q.keyring, q.mac) File "/root/bck/dnspython/dns/query.py", line 412, in receive_tcp one_rr_per_rrset=one_rr_per_rrset) File "/root/bck/dnspython/dns/message.py", line 821, in from_wire reader.read() File "/root/bck/dnspython/dns/message.py", line 749, in read self._get_section(self.message.additional, adcount) File "/root/bck/dnspython/dns/message.py", line 701, in _get_section self.message.first) File "/root/bck/dnspython/dns/tsig.py", line 198, in validate raise BadSignature dns.tsig.BadSignature: The TSIG signature fails to verify. RE: dnspython update dns record issue - nilamo - Mar-26-2017 http://www.dnspython.org/examples.html Wrote:import dns.query import dns.tsigkeyring import dns.update import sys keyring = dns.tsigkeyring.from_text({ 'host-example.' : 'XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX==' }) update = dns.update.Update('dyn.test.example', keyring=keyring) update.replace('host', 300, 'a', sys.argv[1]) response = dns.query.tcp(update, '10.0.0.1') Why is your key ring's value "keyname", instead of "host-example." like in the example? I'm not sure what the lib is supposed to do, so I don't know if those values are valid or not... |