Python Forum
using element on a list as condition statement - Printable Version

+- Python Forum (https://python-forum.io)
+-- Forum: Python Coding (https://python-forum.io/forum-7.html)
+--- Forum: General Coding Help (https://python-forum.io/forum-8.html)
+--- Thread: using element on a list as condition statement (/thread-26931.html)

Pages: 1 2


RE: using element on a list as condition statement - ndc85430 - May-21-2020

(May-20-2020, 12:12 PM)hussainmujtaba Wrote: A list can have the same element multiple times, when converting it to a set, it ll only contain element once. Thus the search space has decreased and it 'll be faster.

This really isn't correct reasoning. Consider a list of length n containing unique items. The performance of the search isn't going to be the same as for a set. With a list, you either have to do a search through the entire thing to find the item you want (which at worst takes time proportional to n, hence why this is called a linear search) or if the list is sorted, perform a binary search (which at worst takes time proportional to log_2 n). Sets are based on hash tables, meaning that items are stored in buckets based on their hash value (a number representing them). Searching for an item means computing its hash (which should be fast!) and then using that as an index into this table, which is an array-like thing, meaning that looking up something by index (and consequently search) is done in constant time (i.e. independent of n). I suspect the constants of proportionality here mean that the difference is going to be noticeable only for sufficiently large n.


RE: using element on a list as condition statement - hussainmujtaba - May-21-2020

(May-20-2020, 02:40 PM)perfringo Wrote:
(May-20-2020, 12:12 PM)hussainmujtaba Wrote: It is more efficient if you convert your list to a set just for comparison purpose. A list can have the same element multiple times, when converting it to a set, it ll only contain element once.

I think that using built-in any() is even more efficient approach. Due to short-circuiting nature it will stop if first match encountered. In real life scenarios this means that if there is a match you don't need to go through all items in list or convert whole list into set. One can craft such a code:

>>> target = 33
>>> lst = [11, 22, 33, 44, 55]  
>>> match = ['is not', 'is'][any(target == item for item in lst)]               
>>> f'{target} {match} in the list'                                             
'33 is in the list'                                                             
>>> target = 10                                                                 
>>> match = ['is not', 'is'][any(target == item for item in lst)]               
>>> f'{target} {match} in the list'                                             
'10 is not in the list'    
Instead of ['is not', 'is'] one can use ['not', ''] and put 'is' into string but it would be too cryptic for my taste.

I am pretty much sure that the both methods will take the exactly the same time to execute.You can check practically if you want