![]() |
Beta Inverse Function - Printable Version +- Python Forum (https://python-forum.io) +-- Forum: Python Coding (https://python-forum.io/forum-7.html) +--- Forum: Data Science (https://python-forum.io/forum-44.html) +--- Thread: Beta Inverse Function (/thread-5090.html) |
Beta Inverse Function - ankur2207 - Sep-18-2017 Hi Everyone, I'm looking for a Beta Inverse Function in Python. Below is the explanation for the same: Returns the inverse of the beta cumulative probability density function (BETA.DIST). If probability = BETA.DIST(x,...TRUE), then BETA.INV(probability,...) = x. The beta distribution can be used in project planning to model probable completion times given an expected completion time and variability. Below is the Excel version of this solution: BETA.INV(probability,alpha,beta,[A],[B]) The BETA.INV function syntax has the following arguments: Probability Required. A probability associated with the beta distribution. Alpha Required. A parameter of the distribution. Beta Required. A parameter the distribution. A Optional. A lower bound to the interval of x. B Optional. An upper bound to the interval of x. Could you please navigate me for the correct solution in Python. Many thanks in advance. Regards, Ankur K RE: Beta Inverse Function - ichabod801 - Sep-18-2017 I think you want to look at scipy.stats. RE: Beta Inverse Function - ankur2207 - Sep-19-2017 No Sir, It just not have the required functionality. Could you please let me know any other package where I can search. Regards, Ankur K RE: Beta Inverse Function - ichabod801 - Sep-19-2017 Isn't scipy.stats.beta.ppf the inverse of the CDF? RE: Beta Inverse Function - andrewmkeller - Jul-23-2018 Nailed it ichabod801! Using scipy.stats.beta.ppf gave me exactly what I was looking for and matches Excel's Beta.INV function perfectly. RE: Beta Inverse Function - ichabod801 - Jul-23-2018 (Jul-23-2018, 08:18 PM)andrewmkeller Wrote: Nailed it ichabod801! Using scipy.stats.beta.ppf gave me exactly what I was looking for and matches Excel's Beta.INV function perfectly. Uh, as a former statistician I am leary of using Excel as a benchmark. ![]() |