Apr-20-2020, 05:39 PM
Thank's a lot for your response!
Everything is now clear to me.
Nevertheless, I must say that here Python syntax reachs the point where balance between compacity of notations and clarity can be discussed...It's not so natural (at least to me) to think that «in» and «==» operator can be chained in ANY case (which is allowed by Python): to me, to give proper meaning to «x in y == z» y should be a sequence, as should also z.
But that's another subject.
Thank's again for your help.
Everything is now clear to me.
Nevertheless, I must say that here Python syntax reachs the point where balance between compacity of notations and clarity can be discussed...It's not so natural (at least to me) to think that «in» and «==» operator can be chained in ANY case (which is allowed by Python): to me, to give proper meaning to «x in y == z» y should be a sequence, as should also z.
But that's another subject.
Thank's again for your help.