How your examples are better than the one in the official docs? I know that not every new method has an example, but it's not always necessary.
Some problems that need to be fixed:
star imports
single-char variable names
e.g. in 3.9 you overwrite the built-in
no documentation/explanations (i.e. only link to official docs, which again brings to the question why and what's benefit compared to docs)
imports at the end of file - I understand what you do, but you should not relay on executing
just importing new modules, how does demonstrate the new features in them?
Some problems that need to be fixed:
star imports
single-char variable names
e.g. in 3.9 you overwrite the built-in
sum
function, probably similar mistake is present elsewhere.no documentation/explanations (i.e. only link to official docs, which again brings to the question why and what's benefit compared to docs)
imports at the end of file - I understand what you do, but you should not relay on executing
passed
module during the import, that's bad designjust importing new modules, how does demonstrate the new features in them?
If you can't explain it to a six year old, you don't understand it yourself, Albert Einstein
How to Ask Questions The Smart Way: link and another link
Create MCV example
Debug small programs
How to Ask Questions The Smart Way: link and another link
Create MCV example
Debug small programs