Jul-05-2017, 12:48 PM
Unless I've missed something, you would loop through the row in exactly the same manner, the difference being that when you access the new row (the one below) then you add a "+ 1" after the variable name. It depends on how your code is set up, but rather than increase the value of the row by (row += 1) which will change the value itself, I would suffix the variable row with a + 1. This leaves the actual value the same but allows you to manipulate and scan the row below or (5 rows below if you use a + 5 etc.!)
Does this makes sense? If not then maybe you could update the code, as far as you can and then we can look at it again?
Best,
Bass
Does this makes sense? If not then maybe you could update the code, as far as you can and then we can look at it again?
Best,
Bass
"The good thing about standards is that you have so many to choose from" Andy S. Tanenbaum