attempted multithread doesn't multithread

[meems]

i think mine's better. because it requires less concepts, keeps the language simpler.
I don't understand why the python writers invoked *args and **kwargs when they already had objects like lists.

In the context of this thread, can tuples, lists, *args or **kwargs be used in threading.Thread to get it to multithread properly? Or does python require a 5th 'multi element' type ( the iterator, implicitly defined when by the syntax (x,)
heck, why not create a unique 'multi element' type for each function needing a 'multiple element' input. That's the pythonic way it seems.