|
Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get()
|
|
http://effbot.org/pyfaq/why-doesnt-pytho...object.htm
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1545...-in-python You could try create a new queue. Swap it out for the old one. Clear old queue then del old queue.
99 percent of computer problems exists between chair and keyboard.
|
|
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Dec-28-2017, 11:16 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by Windspar - Dec-29-2017, 04:47 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Dec-29-2017, 05:53 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by nilamo - Dec-29-2017, 07:20 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Dec-29-2017, 07:36 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by nilamo - Dec-29-2017, 07:58 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Dec-29-2017, 08:06 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by Windspar - Dec-29-2017, 10:51 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Jan-02-2018, 07:07 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by Windspar - Jan-02-2018, 09:38 PM
|
