Dec-29-2017, 07:20 PM
Is it supposed to? I haven't looked into it, but maybe Queue holds onto whatever memory it uses, assuming that it'll need it again for future queued objects...
Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get()
|
|
Messages In This Thread |
Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Dec-28-2017, 11:16 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by Windspar - Dec-29-2017, 04:47 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Dec-29-2017, 05:53 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by nilamo - Dec-29-2017, 07:20 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Dec-29-2017, 07:36 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by nilamo - Dec-29-2017, 07:58 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Dec-29-2017, 08:06 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by Windspar - Dec-29-2017, 10:51 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Jan-02-2018, 07:07 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by Windspar - Jan-02-2018, 09:38 PM
|