|
Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get()
|
|
collections deque
q.queue.clear()Memory should reduce on it own as you grab items. My test show memory reducing it self. Without using del.
99 percent of computer problems exists between chair and keyboard.
|
|
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Dec-28-2017, 11:16 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by Windspar - Dec-29-2017, 04:47 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Dec-29-2017, 05:53 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by nilamo - Dec-29-2017, 07:20 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Dec-29-2017, 07:36 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by nilamo - Dec-29-2017, 07:58 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Dec-29-2017, 08:06 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by Windspar - Dec-29-2017, 10:51 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by yuan8421 - Jan-02-2018, 07:07 PM
RE: Queue.Queue() would not reduce capacity after get() - by Windspar - Jan-02-2018, 09:38 PM
|
