Python Forum
Byte string catenation inefficient in 3.7?
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Byte string catenation inefficient in 3.7?
#13
I've found this reference. It seems that you could replace bytes with bytearray for better performance. The problem is also known to David Beazley, see here.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Byte string catenation inefficient in 3.7? - by Gribouillis - Aug-17-2019, 07:21 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  pyreadstat write_sav inefficient mikisDeWitte 2 2,771 Jun-21-2021, 09:49 AM
Last Post: mikisDeWitte
  'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 122031: invalid continuation byte tienttt 12 11,620 Sep-18-2020, 10:10 PM
Last Post: tienttt
  'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xda in position 184: invalid continuation byte karkas 8 31,741 Feb-08-2020, 06:58 PM
Last Post: karkas
  First Byte of a string is missing while receiving data over TCP Socket shahrukh1987 3 4,270 Nov-20-2019, 10:34 AM
Last Post: shahrukh1987
  HELP: String of Zero's and One's to binary byte schwasskin 1 3,883 May-19-2019, 07:31 AM
Last Post: heiner55
  4 byte hex byte swap from binary file medievil 7 22,167 May-08-2018, 08:16 AM
Last Post: killerrex
  get the content of the byte as string ricardons 5 3,705 Mar-02-2018, 02:41 PM
Last Post: ricardons
  byte string Skaperen 5 3,892 Feb-04-2018, 08:58 AM
Last Post: Gribouillis
  byte string in python2 Skaperen 4 4,359 Nov-23-2017, 03:13 AM
Last Post: Skaperen
  Does Python 3.x have a built-in byte string compare function? Raptor88 2 16,435 Feb-18-2017, 10:44 AM
Last Post: Raptor88

Forum Jump:

User Panel Messages

Announcements
Announcement #1 8/1/2020
Announcement #2 8/2/2020
Announcement #3 8/6/2020