well the whole point is moot.
i should write some code that runs some float maths to discover that true precision (BTDT in C (and asm for x86, Sparc, and S/370) and found a gcc bug many years ago when doing that) instead of using the implementation architecture configuration.
float.hex()
produces sufficient output to represent the complete precision of a float value (same as a double in C) for the x86 architecture. i have not tested other architectures, yet. i counted only the digits to the right of the decimal point because i had been working with those in some code and my mind focused too tightly when checking that.i should write some code that runs some float maths to discover that true precision (BTDT in C (and asm for x86, Sparc, and S/370) and found a gcc bug many years ago when doing that) instead of using the implementation architecture configuration.
Tradition is peer pressure from dead people
What do you call someone who speaks three languages? Trilingual. Two languages? Bilingual. One language? American.
What do you call someone who speaks three languages? Trilingual. Two languages? Bilingual. One language? American.