if else statements

[volcano63]

[EDITED]

class Store:
    Day = 1
    Money = 5
    StoreName = "Lemonade Stand"
    StoreCount = 1
    StoreCost = 3
    StoreProfit = 1.5
    StoreList = []

This code is absolutely redundant - it creates class attributes with the same names as object attributes. It may cause a confusion and is a definite anti-pattern (not class attributes themselves, your usage). See the example below

class Store:
    @staticmethod
    def DisplayGameInfo(self):
        print("-----------------------------------")
        print("Day #" + str(self.Day))
        print("Money = ${:0,.2f}".format(self.Money))

    @staticmethod
    def DisplayStoreInfo(self):

        print("Store Name : %s, StoreCount = #%d " % (self.StoreName, self.StoreCount))
        print("-----------------------------------")

Those are wrong cases for staticmethod decorator - those should be regular methods. Staticmethods in Python should not contain self as a parameter - and should not address object/class attributes. The are just independent functions in the class namespace (and are seldom useful).

Take a look at this small experiment that explains my points

Output:
In [15]: class AntiPattern:
    ...:     attr = 1
    ...:     def __init__(self, attr):
    ...:         self.attr = attr
    ...:     @staticmethod
    ...:     def show_attr(self):
    ...:         return self.attr
    ...:     

In [16]: a = AntiPattern(10)

In [17]: a.attr
Out[17]: 10

In [18]: AntiPattern.attr
Out[18]: 1

In [19]: a.show_attr()
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TypeError                                 Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-19-0d2c01c460f9> in <module>()
----> 1 a.show_attr()

TypeError: show_attr() missing 1 required positional argument: 'self'

The last - but not the least - your names are un-Pythonic, see PEP-8 for guidance

PS I was wondering why your code worked - here's why, you don't instantiate the class, you use it as is! Your __init__ method is never called. This is an absolutely wrong approach for OOP.