Sep-20-2019, 05:50 AM
If m := my_func(args) == 42: passThe above is pointless. Why not:
if my_func(args) == 42: passWhich is a way more readable. Of course if one doesn't need 'm'
Walrus Operator in 3.8
|
|
Messages In This Thread |
Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by nilamo - Feb-07-2019, 10:53 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by micseydel - Feb-08-2019, 12:16 AM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by wavic - Feb-15-2019, 08:17 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by metulburr - Feb-15-2019, 08:42 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by Larz60+ - Feb-15-2019, 08:48 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by ichabod801 - Feb-15-2019, 08:53 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by micseydel - Feb-15-2019, 11:45 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by nilamo - Feb-16-2019, 04:29 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by ichabod801 - Feb-16-2019, 04:58 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by Larz60+ - Feb-16-2019, 05:16 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by Reverend_Jim - Jul-19-2019, 01:04 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by ichabod801 - Jul-19-2019, 01:24 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by DeaD_EyE - Jul-19-2019, 03:41 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by nilamo - Jul-19-2019, 04:25 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by metulburr - Jul-19-2019, 04:34 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by Reverend_Jim - Jul-20-2019, 04:15 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by metulburr - Jul-20-2019, 04:29 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by snippsat - Jul-20-2019, 07:52 PM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by metulburr - Sep-20-2019, 12:17 AM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by wavic - Sep-20-2019, 05:50 AM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by DeaD_EyE - Sep-20-2019, 06:06 AM
RE: Walrus Operator in 3.8 - by metulburr - Sep-20-2019, 12:12 PM
|