Jul-03-2019, 04:46 PM
Shouldn't random.sample be more suitable for task at hand?
>>> import random >>> help(random.sample) Help on method sample in module random: sample(population, k) method of random.Random instance Chooses k unique random elements from a population sequence or set. Returns a new list containing elements from the population while leaving the original population unchanged. The resulting list is in selection order so that all sub-slices will also be valid random samples. This allows raffle winners (the sample) to be partitioned into grand prize and second place winners (the subslices). Members of the population need not be hashable or unique. If the population contains repeats, then each occurrence is a possible selection in the sample. To choose a sample in a range of integers, use range as an argument. This is especially fast and space efficient for sampling from a large population: sample(range(10000000), 60) (END)So you just can write:
>>> for i in range(10): ... print(random.sample(range(1, 100), 10)) ...
I'm not 'in'-sane. Indeed, I am so far 'out' of sane that you appear a tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity. Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
Da Bishop: There's a dead bishop on the landing. I don't know who keeps bringing them in here. ....but society is to blame.
Da Bishop: There's a dead bishop on the landing. I don't know who keeps bringing them in here. ....but society is to blame.