Python Forum
Byte string catenation inefficient in 3.7?
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Byte string catenation inefficient in 3.7?
#13
I've found this reference. It seems that you could replace bytes with bytearray for better performance. The problem is also known to David Beazley, see here.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Byte string catenation inefficient in 3.7? - by Gribouillis - Aug-17-2019, 07:21 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  pyreadstat write_sav inefficient mikisDeWitte 2 2,738 Jun-21-2021, 09:49 AM
Last Post: mikisDeWitte
  'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xe2 in position 122031: invalid continuation byte tienttt 12 11,516 Sep-18-2020, 10:10 PM
Last Post: tienttt
  'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xda in position 184: invalid continuation byte karkas 8 31,650 Feb-08-2020, 06:58 PM
Last Post: karkas
  First Byte of a string is missing while receiving data over TCP Socket shahrukh1987 3 4,231 Nov-20-2019, 10:34 AM
Last Post: shahrukh1987
  HELP: String of Zero's and One's to binary byte schwasskin 1 3,864 May-19-2019, 07:31 AM
Last Post: heiner55
  4 byte hex byte swap from binary file medievil 7 22,074 May-08-2018, 08:16 AM
Last Post: killerrex
  get the content of the byte as string ricardons 5 3,673 Mar-02-2018, 02:41 PM
Last Post: ricardons
  byte string Skaperen 5 3,831 Feb-04-2018, 08:58 AM
Last Post: Gribouillis
  byte string in python2 Skaperen 4 4,335 Nov-23-2017, 03:13 AM
Last Post: Skaperen
  Does Python 3.x have a built-in byte string compare function? Raptor88 2 16,399 Feb-18-2017, 10:44 AM
Last Post: Raptor88

Forum Jump:

User Panel Messages

Announcements
Announcement #1 8/1/2020
Announcement #2 8/2/2020
Announcement #3 8/6/2020