Apr-14-2018, 11:32 AM
Hello ODIS,
thank you. It works.
My English level is low and for this, I simplified the problem, but really I don't have a list (l1), I've a buffer that I don't know how many elements it has, and it changes dynamically.
Then, if use [0:count], maybe I will be out of range.
Of what I'm sure, is that wen I access an element,it exists, because buffer fills up faster than I can empty it.
I hope that I have explained myself acceptably.
Thanks a lot.
thank you. It works.
My English level is low and for this, I simplified the problem, but really I don't have a list (l1), I've a buffer that I don't know how many elements it has, and it changes dynamically.
Then, if use [0:count], maybe I will be out of range.
Of what I'm sure, is that wen I access an element,it exists, because buffer fills up faster than I can empty it.
I hope that I have explained myself acceptably.
Thanks a lot.