Python Forum
opinion: configparser should have been better
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
opinion: configparser should have been better
#9
when posts show code that is more complicated i don't make an effort to understand it because i don't want to go more complicated. and this thread was not intended for code help as i already did my little project (a command to add or delete profiles in Firefox on Linux/Posix). i'm just saying, in a way, that "Mapping Protocol Access" should not have been an add-on; it should have been the way it was done from the beginning, along with customizing like the .optionxform attribute. a dict already has ways to do defaults like .get(). i'm sure that if configparser had not existed and i implemented it some other way, i would have been accused of pythonic heresy.
Tradition is peer pressure from dead people

What do you call someone who speaks three languages? Trilingual. Two languages? Bilingual. One language? American.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: opinion: configparser should have been better - by Skaperen - Oct-03-2020, 07:23 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Upgrade to python 3 opinion hokie1999 5 2,847 May-11-2021, 06:42 PM
Last Post: hokie1999
  what is your opinion of this syntactic sugar idea? Skaperen 8 4,450 Nov-28-2018, 03:15 AM
Last Post: Skaperen
  Guido van Rossum does not care about the opinion of the community. Kirill_Dubovitskiy 12 8,118 Sep-14-2018, 06:33 PM
Last Post: micseydel
  [split] My opinion about OS choice for programming wavic 12 12,025 Oct-07-2016, 10:08 PM
Last Post: wavic

Forum Jump:

User Panel Messages

Announcements
Announcement #1 8/1/2020
Announcement #2 8/2/2020
Announcement #3 8/6/2020